3D Vision Blog

A normal user's look into the world of 3D Stereo Technologies

3D Vision Blog header image 2

Sarah Brightman – Shall Be Done Music Video in Stereo 3D

June 23rd, 2010 · 9 Comments · 3D Movies & Videos

Thanks to biohemmet.se we have another stereoscopic 3D music video available for trying out on your 3D Vision system or any other 3D setup. The video is in Side by Side format, 1080p half resolution (squashed), so don’t forget to select 16:9 aspect ratio when opening it with 3D Vision Video Player or the Stereoscopic Player. The depth effect is quite nice, and as we don’t see a lot of 3D music videos yet, this is something that can show you what to expect from a good music video shot in stereo 3D. As usual if you download and watch this please share your comments below…

Download the Music Video in 3Dmirror 1mirror 2mirror 3mirror 4

Tags: ········

9 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Dave G. // Jun 24, 2010 at 00:56

    I do wonder what cameras they used.

  • 2 Bloody // Jun 24, 2010 at 01:13

    It should be the Panasonic AG-3DA1, at least that would be the logical choice since this song has been produced by and for Panasonic, but who knows…

  • 3 Alex // Jun 24, 2010 at 03:13

    Now, that’s an awful music video, the sound is outrageously bad. Video is 3- with children and other scenery mostly rendered flat. Keep away from this, its a disappointment.

  • 4 StarKnight // Jun 24, 2010 at 06:55

    The song is nothing special but acceptable. The video is nice but very simple and a bit flat (far away from Avatar’s scenes in the forest) and this makes me think it was shot using Panasonic’s AG-3DA1 whose lenses are too close (in my opinion).

  • 5 mr. hu // Jun 24, 2010 at 16:05

    well that was a waste of time

  • 6 Costa // Jun 25, 2010 at 00:17

    OK, the song wasn’t that good but I think the depth was ok. Using wide-angle lenses it could have looked a lot better in 3D. But for that they would have to sacrifice a lot of the nice depth of field.
    This was defitnitely not shot on a Panasonic AG-3DA1. I’m pretty sure for a couple of reasons:
    1. the Panasonic AG-3DA1 is a camcorder with a small chip, so therefore you’ll never get that great depth of field.
    2. the bokeh seen in video can only be produced by a camera with a bigger chip
    3. the depth was quite low, which can’t be done on a Panasonic AG-3DA1 which has quite a huge interocular distance.
    4. Often a large focal length was used which would be problematic with the Pansonic camera becuase the interocular distance is fixed.

  • 7 steve // Jun 25, 2010 at 00:29

    pretty, but totally off her tits :P

  • 8 Gordy // Jan 8, 2011 at 20:30

    If you look at the side by side video, you’ll see keystone correction on the Left. That seems to indicate a beamsplitter.

    In any event, the stereography is not good. The subject or focus of the shot should almost always be played at the screen surface.

    This production pushes most of the action far off the screen, violating good 3D standards. Watching two minutes of this kind of 3D is poor 3D, but doesn’t necessarily hurt the eyes.

    Watch a half-hour or hour show like this… and your eyeballs will be screaming for mercy.

    Don’t take my word for it. When guys like Cameron have been doing this for a decade insist that you keep the subject at the screen surface except for rare, special shots… you disregard expert advice at your peril. Bad 3D.

  • 9 VicentiuB // May 26, 2012 at 00:03

    this 3D version here are in 720p (1280×720 pixels) and NOT in 1080p (1920×1080 pixels !)

Leave a Comment